History Source based questions - Treaty Of Versailles Essay

History Source based questions - Treaty Of Versailles - Essay Example .I have personally no doubt that we will get everything that you can squeeze out of lemon, and a bit more. I propose that every bit of [German-owned] property, movable and immovable, in Allied and neutral countries, whether State property or private property should be surrendered by the Germans. The cartoonist is trying to tell us that the Treaty of Versailles would lead to another war. The four men in the foreground represent (from right to left) Woodrow Wilson, the President of the U.S, Georges Clemenceau, the Prime Minister of France, Vittorio Emanuele Orlando, the Prime Minister of Italy and Lloyd George, the Prime Minister of Britain. These were the Big Four who drew up the Treaty of Versailles, which was signed by Germany in the Palace of Versailles near Paris on June 28, 1919. "The Tiger" refers to Clemenceau, who exercised powerful leadership with his slogan â€Å"I make war!† and became known as â€Å"The Tiger of France†. The cartoonist is suggesting the treaty was too harsh on Germany, because it severely punished it, forcing it to accept responsibility for causing World War I, and blackmailed the German government to sign the Treaty under threat of invasion by the Big Four; because of these biased impositions on the Germans, there will be another w ar in the future. The title of the cartoon suggests that the peace will result in "cannon fodder" in the future because the supposed-to-be ‘peace’ brought about by the Treaty of Versailles actually resulted in total humiliation heaped on Germany; the humiliation was too severe for it to withstand for long, and when it could stand it no more then German cannons would boom again (the cartoonist was right – it took just 22 years from the end of the First World War in 1917 to the beginning of the Second World War in 1939). Clemenceau’s words: â€Å"Curious! I seem to hear a child weeping!† shows that he (and the other 3 leaders of the Big Four) feel that Germany has got a fair deal

Managerial Decidion Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Managerial Decidion Making - Essay Example The basis that conflicts are different gives an insight on how they can be best solved by understanding the underlying principles. Conflicts can either be constructive or harmful depending on the scenario they arise. Positive conflicts also known as constructive conflicts facilitate tolerance, greater understanding, learning and effectiveness where the conflicting parties are able to grow and develop on the conflicting ideas (Dayton, 2012). In order for a conflict to arise, it has to bear some characteristics which are; independent parties are involved, a feeling of resentment, a perception that the other party is at fault and an action that can cause a business problem. This paper focuses on the workplace conflict, the causes of such conflicts and proposes an effective way of resolving conflicts in the workplace. A good example is where Jacob and Austin share an open office workstation. Jacob’s desk is tidy and likes silence in order to pay full attention to the task and beat deadlines. Jacob prefers taking meals from the dining room provided by the company. On the other hand, Austin’s desk is full of empty disposable cups stashed together with dusty files around. When on the phone he talks at the top of his voice, which disrupts Jacob. Despite being provided with dining place, Austin prefers to take meals from his desk while listening to the lunch time news. This behavior by Austin has always driven Jacob crazy and often culminated in arguments that have caught the attention of other workmates. Austin sometimes prefers working from a different terminal. In a nut shell, the conflict in this scenario is caused by the different styles of approach that the two adapt and also the personal values of each one. Purely the above case encompasses all facets of a conflict. In a strong bid to end or minimize conflicts in the workplace, there has to be a clear way of approaching the causes,